Why Wholehearted Harmony Doesn’t Always Separate Horses, Dogs, and People
Species-Appropriate Does Not Mean Species-Isolated
If you spend any amount of time reading through Wholehearted Harmony, you may notice that I do not always keep horses, dogs, and people in separate conversations.
I may begin with something I have observed in a horse, move into human biology, and then use a dog as another example of the same underlying principle.
That is intentional.
I was raised with a very simple understanding: We are all the same, but different. The more I have studied herbs, biology, physiology, nutrition, bodywork, and the way living bodies respond to the world around them, the more sense that has made to me.
Because I do not see three completely separate biological models called horse, dog, and human.
I see biology. I see mammals with incredibly complex bodies built around many of the same fundamental requirements and regulatory processes.
And then I look at how that biology is expressed within the species—and within the individual standing in front of me.
There Is a Biological Model
Horses, dogs, and humans are all mammals.
We have nervous systems.
Immune systems.
Digestive systems.
Endocrine systems.
Circulatory systems.
Musculoskeletal systems.
Organs, tissues, cells, hormones, neurotransmitters, enzymes, minerals, amino acids, fatty acids, and countless other substances and processes involved in maintaining life.
We digest.
We metabolize.
We regulate temperature.
We respond to stress.
We experience inflammation.
We repair tissue.
We adapt.
We compensate.
We reproduce.
We sleep and rest.
We require water.
We require nourishment.
We respond continuously to our environment.
The biological machinery is not identical, but neither is it unrelated. That is the part I think we sometimes lose when everything is divided into categories.
There is not one fundamental law of biology for the horse and another one for the dog and another one for the human. There is biology—and biology expresses itself through the design of the organism.
Same Biology. Different Expression.
This is where species-appropriate comes in. Species-appropriate does not mean we need completely separate philosophies of health. It means we respect how biology is expressed through that particular species.
A horse is a grazing herbivore. A dog has a very different digestive history and feeding biology. Humans have our own nutritional and physiological requirements.
So yes, the foods will differ. The quantities will differ. The feeding patterns may differ. The herbs that make biological sense may differ. The way an herb is prepared or offered may differ and metabolism, digestion, behavior, movement, environmental needs, and response patterns may differ and then the individual creates another layer entirely.
But underneath all of that, I am still asking biological questions.
Is the body receiving nourishment it can actually use?
Are its fundamental needs being met?
What is the environment asking the body to adapt to?
How well is it regulating?
What is it compensating for?
What is the body communicating?
That is the model.
Not a human model.
Not an equine model.
Not a canine model.
A biological model applied appropriately to the organism in front of me.
Food Is One of Our Greatest Connections
Food may be one of the easiest places to see what I mean.
Every one of us depends on the outside world to supply the raw materials necessary to sustain the inside of the body.
The foods themselves are not necessarily the same. They shouldn't be, but the relationship is.
Living organisms take food from their environment and turn it into energy, structure, repair, cellular material, chemical messengers, enzymes, hormones, and the countless substances required for life.
That is why I come back to whole food over and over again. Not because a horse, dog, and human should eat the same plate of food. Of course not, but because each should receive food that makes biological sense for that organism.
To me, that is very different from building health around an endless list of isolated products designed to correct one perceived deficiency after another.
Food is foundational and food is species-appropriate by its very nature when we actually pay attention to the biology.
And Then There Are Herbs
Herbs may be an even more fascinating connection.
Plants and animals did not begin interacting when somebody invented a supplement bottle.
The botanical world has always been part of the environment in which animals and humans live.
Humans have eaten plants, prepared plants, smelled plants, made teas and foods from plants, and used them traditionally for generations upon generations. Animals encounter botanicals within their natural environments as well.
This is one of the reasons I say so often:
Herbs are food, they are not little green pharmaceuticals. They contain extraordinarily complex combinations of nutrients and botanical compounds that living bodies interact with biologically.
Does that mean every herb belongs in every horse, dog, or human? Absolutely not. That would completely miss the point.
The plant must still make sense for the species and it must make sense for the individual. Just as the amount matters, the form matters, the reason for using it matters. The rest of the formulation matters.
But I do not need to invent an entirely new philosophy of herbalism every time I move from a horse to a dog to a human. The biological relationship with plants is still there.
The application changes. The biological relationship does not disappear.
Maybe Animals Help Us Remember What We Are
One of the things I love most about working across species is that animals continually bring me back to the basics.
A horse does not know what the wellness industry is selling this week and a dog does not read a symptom list and decide which trendy nutrient it must be deficient in.
They do not know that a particular herb has been marketed for the liver, another for anxiety, another for hormones, and another for inflammation. They simply have biology and because they cannot explain that biology to us in words, we have to observe.
What changed?
What does the body show us?
What is happening in the environment?
What is the animal eating?
How is it moving?
How is it resting?
What happens when something new is introduced?
What happens when something is removed?
What patterns keep repeating?
That requires us to look at the organism rather than immediately looking for a product. And I think animals can teach us an enormous amount about ourselves because underneath all of our language, diagnoses, internet searches, supplement cabinets, and theories, humans are biological organisms too.
We did not somehow graduate out of biology.
This Is Why Wholehearted Harmony Crosses Species
Wholehearted Harmony has never made sense to me as three unrelated businesses sitting under one name.
Equine over here.
Canine over there.
Human somewhere else.
That is not how I see the work. There are times when a subject absolutely needs a species-specific conversation. If I am talking about the horse's digestive design, then I need to talk about the horse. If I am discussing something that is unsafe or inappropriate for dogs, that distinction matters and if I am formulating for a human, I need to consider human physiology and that person's individual biology.
Species matters, but there are other conversations where separating everyone simply because one has four legs and another has two would make very little biological sense.
Inflammation is not exclusively human.
Nervous-system regulation is not exclusively equine.
Adaptation is not canine.
Nourishment does not belong to one species.
Neither does immune activity, cellular repair, biological communication, environmental response, compensation, or the body's constant attempt to maintain internal stability.
Sometimes the subject is bigger than the species, and when it is, I talk about it that way.
This Is Also Why PIM™ Can Cross Species
The same thinking is woven into the Phytosomatic Integration Method™.
PIM™ does not work across species because horses, dogs, and humans are identical.
It works across species because biological organisms receive input and respond to that input.
How that response appears can differ.
A human can tell me what they feel internally.
A horse cannot.
A dog's observable expression may look different from either one.
Presentation has to respect the species.
Observation has to respect the species.
Interpretation has to respect the species.
And any botanical support developed from that assessment absolutely has to respect the species and the individual.
But the starting principle remains remarkably simple: Present the botanical. Observe the biological response. Listen before deciding. That principle does not suddenly stop being relevant because the mammal in front of me changed.
Species-Appropriate Is About Respecting Biology
To me, species-appropriate does not mean constructing walls between species. It means respecting biological design.
Feed the organism according to its biology.
Move it according to its biology.
Allow it to rest according to its biology.
Consider its environment according to its biology.
Use botanicals according to its biology.
And when the body communicates, pay attention according to its biology. The specifics may change enormously, the foundation does not. That is why you will sometimes see Wholehearted Harmony talking about horses, dogs, and people in the same conversation.
It is not because I think we are interchangeable, it is because I think we are connected.
Through food.
Through plants.
Through the environment.
Through physiology.
Through the basic biological processes that make a living body a living body.
We Are the Same. And We Are Different.
That idea has stayed with me my entire life is that we are all the same, but different.
The differences deserve respect.
But so do the similarities. Sometimes understanding the horse helps me see the human more clearly. Sometimes watching a dog reminds me how easily we complicate something that begins with basic biology. Sometimes plants show us that the categories we have created are far more rigid than nature ever was. And sometimes food is the simplest reminder of all.
Different species may require different foods.
Different individuals may require different support.
Different herbs may belong in different formulations.
But every one of those decisions still begins in the same place:
What makes biological sense for the living organism in front of me?
That is Wholehearted Harmony, not one model for humans, another for horses, and another for dogs.
Biology first. Species-appropriate application second. Individuality always. Species-appropriate does not mean species-isolated.
With love, herbs & harmony
Debbi, Advanced Master Herbalist
Wholehearted Harmony
Comments